MudmotorTalk.com
http://www.mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/

The Wall Street Journal's article on Obama
http://www.mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=31279
Page 1 of 1

Author:  SmokeEater829 [ Mon Aug 06, 2012 2:59 pm ]
Post subject:  The Wall Street Journal's article on Obama

TRUER WORDS WERE
NEVER SPOKEN!!
whoa this is serious stuff for TWSJ


Wall Street Journal Sizes Up Obama

A "deadly" article regarding Obama, at the Wall Street Journal, which today is the most widely circulated newspaper in America.

Article from the Wall Street Journal - by Alan Caruba:

"I have this theory about Barack Obama. I think he's led a kind of make-believe life in which money was provided and doors were opened because at some point early on somebody or some group (George Soros anybody?) took a look at this tall, good looking, half-white, half-black, young man with an exotic African/Muslim name and concluded he could be guided toward a life in politics where his facile speaking skills could even put him in the White House.

In a very real way, he has been a young man in a very big hurry. Who else do you know has written two memoirs before the age of 45? "Dreams of My Father" was published in 1995 when he was only 34 years old. The "Audacity of Hope" followed in 2006. If, indeed, he did write them himself. There are some who think that his mentor and friend, Bill Ayers, a man who calls himself a "communist with a small 'c'" was the real author.

His political skills consisted of rarely voting on anything that might be deemed controversial. He went from a legislator in the Illinois legislature to the Senator from that state because he had the good fortune of having Mayor Daley's formidable political machine at his disposal.

He was in the U.S. Senate so briefly that his bid for the presidency was either an act of astonishing self-confidence or part of some greater game plan that had been determined before he first stepped foot in the Capital. How, many must wonder, was he selected to be a 2004 keynote speaker at the Democrat convention that nominated John Kerry when virtually no one had ever even heard of him before?

He outmaneuvered Hillary Clinton in primaries. He took Iowa by storm. A charming young man, an anomaly in the state with a very small black population, he oozed "cool" in a place where agriculture was the antithesis of cool. He dazzled the locals. And he had an army of volunteers drawn to a charisma that hid any real substance.

And then he had the great good fortune of having the Republicans select one of the most inept candidates for the presidency since Bob Dole. And then John McCain did something crazy. He picked Sarah Palin, an unknown female governor from the very distant state of Alaska. It was a ticket that was reminiscent of 1984's Walter Mondale and Geraldine Ferraro and they went down to defeat.

The mainstream political media fell in love with him. It was a schoolgirl crush with febrile commentators like Chris Mathews swooning then and now over the man. The venom directed against McCain and, in particular, Palin, was extraordinary.

Now, 3 full years into his presidency, all of those gilded years leading up to the White House have left him unprepared to be President. Left to his own instincts, he has a talent for saying the wrong thing at the wrong time. It swiftly became a joke that he could not deliver even the briefest of statements without the ever-present Tele-Prompters.

Far worse, however, is his capacity to want to "wish away" some terrible realities, not the least of which is the Islamist intention to destroy America and enslave the West. Any student of history knows how swiftly Islam initially spread. It knocked on the doors of Europe, having gained a foothold in Spain.

The great crowds that greeted him at home or on his campaign "world tour" were no substitute for having even the slightest grasp of history and the reality of a world filled with really bad people with really bad intentions.

Oddly and perhaps even inevitably, his political experience, a cakewalk, has positioned him to destroy the Democrat Party's hold on power in Congress because in the end it was never about the Party. It was always about his communist ideology, learned at an early age from family, mentors, college professors, and extreme leftist friends and colleagues.

Obama is a man who could deliver a snap judgment about a Boston police officer who arrested an "obstreperous" Harvard professor-friend, but would warn Americans against "jumping to conclusions" about a mass murderer at Fort Hood who shouted "Allahu Akbar." The absurdity of that was lost on no one. He has since compounded this by calling the Christmas bomber "an isolated extremist" only to have to admit a day or two later that he was part of an al Qaeda plot.

He is a man who could strive to close down our detention facility at Guantanamo even though those released were known to have returned to the battlefield against America. He could even instruct his Attorney General to afford the perpetrator of 9/11 a civil trial when no one else would ever even consider such an obscenity. And he is a man who could wait three days before having anything to say about the perpetrator of yet another terrorist attack on Americans and then have to elaborate on his remarks the following day because his first statement was so lame.

The pattern repeats itself. He either blames any problem on the Bush administration or he naively seeks to wish away the truth.

Knock, knock. Anyone home? Anyone there? Barack Obama exists only as the sock puppet of his handlers, of the people who have maneuvered and manufactured this pathetic individual's life.

When anyone else would quickly and easily produce a birth certificate, this man spent over a million dollars to deny access to his. Most other documents, the paper trail we all leave in our wake, have been sequestered from review. He has lived a make-believe life whose true facts remain hidden.

We laugh at the ventriloquist's dummy, but what do you do when the dummy is President of the United States.

We the people are coming!

Author:  oncall [ Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Wall Street Journal's article on Obama

Unfortunately, 51% of Americans got hooked on his koolaid.. :roll:

Author:  med [ Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Wall Street Journal's article on Obama

That fella needs a raise for getting that to print!

Tapatalk 2

Author:  WestEndAngler [ Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Wall Street Journal's article on Obama

I don't think it ran in the WSJ... instead it was actually on his blog page:

http://factsnotfantasy.blogspot.com/201 ... -life.html

Author:  SP [ Mon Aug 06, 2012 7:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Wall Street Journal's article on Obama

I wish more people would understand how little we really know about our President's past....

Author:  rangerp [ Tue Aug 07, 2012 6:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Wall Street Journal's article on Obama

x

Author:  dguidry [ Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Wall Street Journal's article on Obama

Sometimes you fellas don't give a rats ass about the credibility or authenticity of your sources. Here's a comment from the author's blog which says it for me. I don't have time to debunk each and every one of the political posts on here so please try to research your sources better so as not to waste everyone's time.

Larry K said...
Sad day in the United States when people start believing this sort of commentary. And the one creating this article even tried to make it legitimate by saying it came from the Wall Street Journal. It did not come from the Wall Street Journal. Do your own researching. But what is sad this sort of article even though it is chocked full of false information is effective. Because people just want to believe what they want to believe, whether it is true or not. Especially if it supports their viewpoint. If you want to do what's right and just. Search out truths whether good or bad. And base your opinion of that information. Not garbage such as this

FEBRUARY 10, 2010 3:31 PM

Author:  rangerp [ Tue Aug 07, 2012 3:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Wall Street Journal's article on Obama

x

Author:  POKER1 [ Tue Aug 07, 2012 3:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Wall Street Journal's article on Obama

It will be interesting when the day comes that Obammer steps up and says, "Boy I sure had all you Crackers fooled, I never was a US citizen"........... " Thanks for letting me destroy your country anyway".

Author:  Robn1020 [ Tue Aug 07, 2012 3:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Wall Street Journal's article on Obama

DGuidry,

I honestly feel sorry for you at this point. I mean this respectfully. It is doubtful that a man who graduated with a law degree still argues for this man. I understand you have loyalty to the democratic party but your arguments are becoming more rediculous. I truly hope, with you and all your children whom have graduated from private elite universities, that your clan is not this dense. This man has created a horrible situation in this country that will continue to worsen. You really want to vote for an A$$hole?

Author:  hunt682 [ Tue Aug 07, 2012 3:58 pm ]
Post subject:  The Wall Street Journal's article on Obama


Author:  Tony B [ Tue Aug 07, 2012 4:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Wall Street Journal's article on Obama

This to me says a lot without saying a word. These leaders by their actions send a message that they could piss on this guy. Our great country was once respected around the world but with this cat driving the boat, not so much.

It's really scary when you think about how these leaders think of our president, and think how stupid Americans must have been to put him in the whitehouse to begin with.


Author:  oncall [ Tue Aug 07, 2012 4:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Wall Street Journal's article on Obama


Author:  NA [ Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:02 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Wall Street Journal's article on Obama

It's time to flush this turd.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/