RangerPeePee: The great majority of homosexuals are nice, law abiding, caring, individuals. Let's focus on those individuals for a moment and your thoughts on their behavior as you see it. I believe that you believe there cannot be a "good homosexual" citizen, soldier, mother, father, friend, teammate, professional colleague, coworker, brother, sister, etc, because they are all "deviants" in your eyes and all should be rounded up and sent to rehabilitation facilities because they are a danger to society. That's what you really would like to see happened, correct? If your commander in chief were homosexual, you would not follow his command, correct? If your sibling came out you would sever your ties with him, correct? I believe that when you take a shower in the common shower in a military zone you may wear a blind fold to eliminate the possibility you might glance at another soldier's pee pee lest you be accused of being a homosexual yourself. I think some of the comments questioning why you focus on the topic of homosexuals so much are correct and I suspect you may be uncomfortable with your own sexuality.

Dguidry stated – “RangerPeePee: The great majority of homosexuals are nice, law abiding, caring, individuals. Let's focus on those individuals for a moment and your thoughts on their behavior as you see it. I believe that you believe there cannot be a "good hosexuomal" citizen, soldier, mother, father, friend, teammate, professional colleague, coworker, brother, sister, etc, because they are all "deviants" in your eyes and all should be rounded up and sent to rehabilitation facilities because they are a danger to society. That's what you really would like to see happened, correct? If your commander in chief were homosexual, you would not follow his command, correct? If your sibling came out you would sever your ties with him, correct? I believe that when you take a shower in the common shower in a military zone you may wear a blind fold to eliminate the possibility you might glance at another soldier's pee pee lest you be accused of being a homosexual yourself. I think some of the comments questioning why you focus on the topic of homosexuals so much are correct and I suspect you may be uncomfortable with your own sexuality.”

We will take this chunk by chunk

“RangerPeePee: The great….” For starters, you change my screen name and initiate by being derogatory. Start back from the beginning, and show me one time where I call anyone a derogatory name, or act unprofessionally.

“The great majority of homosexual are nice, law abiding, caring….” Exchange homosexual with adulterer, swinger, pedophile, rapist, molester,. Homosexuality is a deviation just like the others. You want to ignore the fact that this crowd is but 2.5% and does a third of all child molestations that they are now on the attack against Christians. Terry Bean was a main stream homosexual and one of the most powerful names in the gay community. He was literally a friend of the President. He raped a 15 year old boy, and you ignore this, and do not mind that the MSM ignore it.

“I believe that you believe there cannot be a "good homosexual" citizen, soldier, mother, father” I do not give a flying rat’s butt what you believe, nor should anyone care what I believe. This post is not about my beliefs. If I want you to know what I believe, I will tell you. It is not your place to guess. This threads is a collection of irrefutable facts, history, statistics, medicine, crime stats…. You do not find me saying “I believe….” I lay out the truth, and you do with it as you please. In typical lib fashion, the truth teller gets attacked here. To be factual on the solider piece, every single gay solider I have had contact with in my 28 years has been subpar. I can list them by name and literally list the crimes they committed. Heck, we can start with Bradley Manning if you want. Gays do not make good parents. Latter today I will list a series of links on recent stories where Lesbians have beat, killed, and tortured little boys. There are recent peer reviewed studies showing kids being raised in the families with gay parents have much higher rates of suicide, school drop out, drug use, criminal activity, being on welfare….

“and all should be rounded up and sent to rehabilitation facilities because they are a danger to society.” Please go back, and copy and paste where I one time mentioned rounding anyone up, or sending anyone anywhere. This is a lie made up by you. Now go back and read the quotes I put for Kevin Jennings, on where he speaks of Christians. Truth is the only groups that wants to round folks up, is the progressive left. They want to round up the Christian business owners. That day is coming.

“If your commander in chief were homosexual, you would not follow his command, correct?” I do solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic……. There is nothing in my oath about following homosexual presidents. Our President is the dually elected President of the United States, he is the Commander in Chief. When he declared a surge in Afghanistan, I had my hand raised, and went and served. That being said, the current president is not the Pope of the Church of America. Not such position exists, and no such church exists. Our moral compass is not required to change direction based on the outcome of an election. Truth remains truth regardless who occupies the White House. The first amendment is still in effect.

“If your sibling came out you would sever your ties with him, correct?” I love my brothers, my sisters, my parents, my neighbors, my children, my fellow soldiers, my fellow church members…. If any of them confide in me that they are caught up in adultery, drugs, homosexuality, theft, gambling, lying, or any other sexual deviation, addiction or sin, I will continue to love them, I will pray for them, I will be willing to meet and counsel them. I will not condone their sin. They are welcome to attend church with me, I am willing to go meet with them. They will not bring their sin into my house, nor will they bring it around my children.

“……are correct and I suspect you may be uncomfortable with your own sexuality.” I have been down this round a thousand times. When you stand up and speak the truth on homosexuality, by laying out the facts, the stats, and the history, you get called a hater, a bigot, and a homophobe. When the name calling fails to stop me speaking the truth, the next step it to try and silence me by accusing me of homosexuality. Sorry, does not work. I love my wife, and find her to be beautiful in every way. Heck, I find women to be beautiful. How any man could ever look at his fellow man’s hairy butt, and associate it with love is beyond me.

NEXT!

“RangerPeePee: The great….” For starters, you change my screen name and initiate by being derogatory. Start back from the beginning, and show me one time where I call anyone a derogatory name, or act unprofessionally. "

Its my form of endearment. Consider it a compliment. If I have not corrupted a members username yet, he just hasn't tried hard enough.

“The great majority of homosexual are nice, law abiding, caring….” Exchange homosexual with adulterer, swinger, pedophile, rapist, molester,. Homosexuality is a deviation just like the others.

RangerPeePee: This is exactly the response from you I was hoping for. You categorize all homosexuals as not only deviants, but criminals, as well. Adultery is a deviant behavior???? My lawd, I do believe you've gone too far and there is absolutely no hope in ever having any meaningful conversation with you on this topic. Adultery is not deviant behavior. It is normal human behavior. It may be socially frowned upon but its not deviant.

http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2015/02/14305/

Above link is an outstanding article concerning "transgender"

Keep in mind the "T" in LGBT is for transgender. They lump all of these together for a reason.

Also keep in mind that the Secretary of Defense has vocalized support (against the wishes of military commanders) to allow transgender soldiers to serve openly.

Keep in mind that the lawyers defending Bradley Manning defending him by claiming his Transgender DISORDER contributed to his action. If lawyers can defend being a traitor because of Transgender DISORDER, do you think they need to be serving openly?

Consider this also. If a transgender soldier can serve, and if the chain of command has to recognize a soldier not by his/her biological sex, but by their declared gender, could a male soldier fail the Physical test then declare himself a female, and demand to be graded on the female standard? What is the test for declaring one to be transgender. is there a hair follicle test? A blood test? A DNA test? A Transgender board? Or is being transgender purely declared by word of mouth? Would there be any chance that a male who is not transgender might declare himself a female, just to have access to a the female shower?

http://www.frc.org/issuebrief/new-study ... s-research

This is another link worth the read. It is a legit peer reviewed study from a professor form the University of Texas at Austin.

Is it really about the children? If it is, I challenge you to read this and then ask if it is moral to have homosexuals adopting children.

I do not care if you believe in creation or evolution. Can you honestly tell yourself that children are not better off being raised by a mother and a father.

Here is just a small sample of links where lesbians across the country are killing, torturing , and abusing boys. I have more if you want them.

http://www.wnd.com/2008/06/67147/

https://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2007/1 ... r-old-boy/

http://thetruthplainansimple.info/thebi ... -to-death/

http://rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/ ... u-love-me/

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1603097/posts

Dguidry posted "RangerPeePee: This is exactly the response from you I was hoping for. You categorize all homosexuals as not only deviants, but criminals, as well. Adultery is a deviant behavior???? My lawd, I do believe you've gone too far and there is absolutely no hope in ever having any meaningful conversation with you on this topic. Adultery is not deviant behavior"



Go tell the Congress that "adultery is not deviant behavior". It is not only grounds for divorce in America, it is grounds for Uniform Code of Military (UCMJ) Punishment for officers in our military, and the same for the enlisted ranks. Congress has to sign off on the UCMJ. It was grounds to punish GEN David Petraeus, and a whole slew of others. If you can not remain loyal to our own wife, can we trust you to remain loyal to the nation, to your troops, or to the mission?

http://usmilitary.about.com/od/punitive ... cm1342.htm


Here is a link showing adultery as being punishable under the manual for courts- martial

http://www.sapr.mil/public/docs/ucmj/UC ... rticle.pdf

I figured a lawyer would be aware of this stuff. have you told your wife that adultery is not deviant behavior?

“If your sibling came out you would sever your ties with him, correct?” I love my brothers, my sisters, my parents, my neighbors, my children, my fellow soldiers, my fellow church members…. If any of them confide in me that they are caught up in adultery, drugs, homosexuality, theft, gambling, lying, or any other sexual deviation, addiction or sin, I will continue to love them, I will pray for them, I will be willing to meet and counsel them. I will not condone their sin. They are welcome to attend church with me, I am willing to go meet with them. They will not bring their sin into my house, nor will they bring it around my children."

So if a homosexual were invited to your house and disclosed he was such in a casual conversation, you would escort him out, isn't that correct?

So if a homosexual were dying in battle and in his dying words asked you to convey to his boyfriend his love and affection, you would not, isn't that correct?

if you answer these with more than a yes or no and copy and paste endless bullshit trying to connect your Commander in Chief to child molesters, I will infer that your answers are yes to these questions and you basically don't give a shit about 2.5% of the people in the US. I'll use your figure, because that's still over 7.5 million people.

I presume you go through a similar statistical analysis to determine what color skin is predisposed to crime, in order to determine what races to invite into your home.

...double post.

Dguidry stated “You categorize all homosexuals as not only deviants, but….

I do not “categorize” Homosexuality as anything. It is categorized for me by my Bible, and by science.

With our 1st Amendment, we Americans have the right to worship as we see fit. Christians have a right to believe the Bible. Both Testaments are very clear that homosexuality is sin.

Lev 18 22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination
Romans 1 : 26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient.

For the sake of Dguidry, let us completely take religion out of the mix, and look at this from a purely scientific and medical standpoint.

My first scientific statement will come from non other than (Don’t laugh) Mr Phil Roberts from Duck Dynasty. When he stated. “"It seems like, to me, a vagina—as a man—would be more desirable than a man's anus. That's just me. I'm just thinking”

What he said is actually very scientific. The anus is not a sex organ (regardless if you believe in creation or evolution). The anus is a one way exit for excrement. Men with men sex puts both partners in contact with blood and fecal matter. The anus is thin walled and non-lubricated. Men with men sex leads to anal seepage, hemorrhoids, tears, fissures, gay bowel syndrome, and great increases in anal and colon cancer. Gay men suffer from much higher rates of STDs, where they carry 64% of the naiton’s syphilis, and made up over 60% of new HIV cases last year. They are also 27 times more likely to have infectious diseases because of the contact with blood. They also suffer from much higher rates of suicide.

http://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/for-your-health.htm
http://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/STD.htm
http://www.cdc.gov/std/life-stages-popu ... ct-MSM.htm
http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/stdfact-hpv-and-men.htm


Above are numerous links to the federal CDC site, where fact sheets show the dangers of men with men sex. There are no fact sheets needed for those that partake in monogamous heterosexual sex. The vagina is a sex organ, it is lubricated, and it is designed for sex.

Dguidry stated “I presume you go through a similar statistical analysis to determine what color skin is predisposed to crime, in order to determine what races to invite into your home.”

“Skin color is a benign, non-behavioral characteristic. Sexual orientation is perhaps the most profound of all behavioral characteristics. Comparison of the two is a convenient but invalid argument.” (Source: Colin Powell, My American Journey, 1995, p. 533)


Dguidry stated – “So if a homosexual were invited to your house and disclosed he was such in….”
I do not invited child molesters, rapist, swingers, transgenders, homosexuals, drug addicts, thieves…. To my house

Dguidry stated “So if a homosexual were dying in battle and in his dying words asked you to convey to his boyfriend his love and affecti….”

If Homosexual Terry Bean were dying in your office and wanted you to convey love to the 15 year old boy he raped, would you carry that out?

If an adulterer was dying in your office, and wanted you to convey his love to his girlfriend, and not his wife….

If a swinger wanted you to convey love to multiple families…..

double post again.

Here you go dean I have more if u need it


Sent from denda this

So RangerPeePee: If you unknowingly invited a homosexual to your home and in a conversation he revealed he was a homosexual, after you escorted him out of your house, would you use bleach or regular soap to clean the chair in which he was seated?

RangerPeePee: Its funny to me and I'm pretty sure most, how you characterized homosexuality as something to be just "caught up in".

RangerPeePee: Do you realize that sodomy is not a crime in the US? Deviant behavior considered so out of the norm to be dangerous to society, has always been legislatively defined as a criminal act by statute. Adultery and sodomy are not crimes (except bestiality).

Dguidry stated - “It's a policy in place as a barrier against undue influence as in a superior officer taking advantage of his soldiers. It has nothing to do with the behavior itself being immoral or deviant.”

Not so

2) Conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline or of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces. To constitute an offense under the UCMJ, the adulterous conduct must either be directly prejudicial to good order and discipline or service discrediting. Adulterous conduct that is directly prejudicial includes conduct that has an obvious, and measurably divisive effect on unit or organization discipline, morale, or cohesion, or is clearly detrimental to the authority or stature of or respect toward a service member. Adultery may also be service discrediting, even though the conduct is only indirectly or remotely prejudicial to good order and discipline. Discredit means to injure the reputation of the armed forces and includes adulterous conduct that has a tendency, because of its open or notorious nature, to bring the service into disrepute, make lower it in public esteem. While adulterous conduct that is private and discreet in nature may not be service discrediting by this standard, under the circumstances, it may be determined to be conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline. Commanders should consider all relevant circumstances, including but not limited to the following factors, when determining whether adulterous acts are prejudicial to good order and discipline or are of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces:

Dguidry asked “ So RangerPeePee: If you unknowingly invited a homosexual to your home and in a conversation he revealed he was a homosexual, after you escorted him out of your house, would you use bleach or regular soap to clean the chair in which he was seated?”

Not sure I am tracking your question. Do you use bleach after homosexuals come to your office or home? Is there a reason I should? Granted, they are but 2.5% of the population and carry 64% of the syphilis, made up over 60% of new HIV cases in the US last year, have much higher rates of HPV, Hepatitis, and other diseases, but these are passed on sexually, not from sitting in chairs.

You also stated “after you escorted him out of your house”.
I am not sure where you came up with the “escorted” statement. I never spoke of escorting anyone anywhere. That is something fictitious that you made up.

Here's some more dean seems like you need it


Sent from denda this

Dguidry

Please ask your wife if adultery is a deviant behavior, and let us know what she thinks.

I may be old fashioned, and still believe in The Ten Commandments. Not only my wife, but I also believe that adultery is deviant in nature.

adjective: deviant
1. 1.
departing from usual or accepted standards, especially in social or sexual behavior.
"deviant behavior"
synonyms: aberrant, abnormal, atypical, anomalous, irregular, nonstandard;


http://www.statisticbrain.com/infidelity-statistics/

according to the study above 36% of married Americans admit to having adultery during their married lives. So I guess the majority do not, making the 36% a "deviation" from the norm.

RangerPeePee: Neither you nor I know enough about deltas and standard deviations to argue statistics with anyone, so lets just admit it can't be done with homosexuals and adulterers.

My stats are rock solid. the CDC is a federal organization. I think I can use their numbers with confidence.

They would hold up in court, and the 2.5% held up with the Supreme Court. do you need the link?

Dgudiry stated "Its a hypothetical. Sorry if you aren't familiar with those"

I stick with facts and that which is real.

Obama's gay friend Terry Bean raping a 15 year old boy is real

Obama's appointment of gay activist Kevin Jennings is real

Obama having 1:6 ratio of appointing gays to gov positions is real

Kevin Jennings hiding the rape of a 15 year old boy is real

Gay rights powerhouse Larry Bilkins being convicted of child porn is real

Obama having a gay transvestite nanny is real

Obama calling for gay scout masters is real

Obama forcing the military to end DADT, but forcing non-gays to share shower and living facilities is real

Gays committing 1/3 of the nation's child molestations is real

Gays being 2.5% of the pop, having the majority of most STDs is real

Dguidry stated "My wife is intelligent enough to understand the distinction between criminally deviant behavior and adultery, and to understand that adultery is not deviant. Its just not socially acceptable in our society. But I must note to you that, more than 50% of marriages end in divorces in this country so I'm pretty sure its too frequent an occurrence to be considered a deviation. I'm an expert at divorces so I know what is normal in our society in that regard."




This is not the question I asked you.


Please go to your wife, and ask this question. "Dear, do you consider adultery to be a deviant behavior?"

rangerPeePee said: Homophobia does not have squat to do with STDs.

I quoted directly from god damn CDC report, you knucklehead.

So you want to say Bean is not Obama's friend?

watch the clip, and see Obama call him a friend. did Obama lie?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa5zOVIuKVE

CDC's website: http://www.cdc.gov/std/life-stages-popu ... ct-MSM.htm

a few more

and some more

Dguidry posted "rangerPeePee said: Homophobia does not have squat to do with STDs.

I quoted directly from god damn CDC report, you knucklehead."





So, if a heterosexual gets to close to a homophobe like me, can he catch an STD?

I wonder why STDs are so prevalent in places like San Francisco, where homosexuality is the norm, and is accepted?

The "S" in STD is for "SEX". You generally have to have sex to get an STD.

Lesbians have higher rates of STDs than heterosexual women. They catch them from men. Statistically, lesbians have more unprotected sex with men that hetero women do. It stems from the fact that lesbians also hang out with gay men. Lesbians have a very high rate of drug and alcohol use, and when drunk people are together, they have unprotected sex.

HIV is highest among gay men, because it is generally passed on by gay sex. We discussed this before. When men have anal sex, blood gets passed from one partner to the other. It may be fun to blame on heterosexuals and homophobes, but any amount of logic can clear it up for you.

I once took a picture with the band members of Los Lobos, does that make me a better guitar player?

photo.los lobos.JPG

double post