| MudmotorTalk.com http://www.mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/ |
|
| 29 Kawasaki vs. 35 Vanguard http://www.mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=16957 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | whistlingwings [ Wed Mar 16, 2011 12:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | 29 Kawasaki vs. 35 Vanguard |
I've been thinking about upgrading my bowfishing fan from my 29 kaw to a 35 briggs. I can't find any torque specs on the briggs. I've been told that the 29 is a dog compared to 35 in a MM application. I have a 35 gtr but I can't really compare the two engines due to their different applications. Anyone have experience w/ both engines? |
|
| Author: | drake1 [ Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 29 Kawasaki vs. 35 Vanguard |
Yep, Put a Generac on it. |
|
| Author: | Salty Dawg [ Fri Mar 25, 2011 11:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 29 Kawasaki vs. 35 Vanguard |
well since I have ran a 29 Kawi on a Hyper sport and when the motor took a crap I put a 35 briggs on the frame I guess I could give you some info... the 35 has a ton more bottom end and the top end was about the same... don't know if its just because of the more HP but I am way more happy with the briggs vs the Kawi... Jake |
|
| Author: | idabilly [ Sat Mar 26, 2011 8:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 29 Kawasaki vs. 35 Vanguard |
I have owned both of those powerplants on the same Mudbuddy drive / frame. The Briggs 35 will haul bigger loads at a faster pace plus it will get them up on plane faster. For smaller 16 ft boats and light loads the Kawi is ok, but for 17-18' boats and bigger loads the Briggs is superior. |
|
| Author: | Duckdiver [ Mon May 23, 2011 5:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 29 Kawasaki vs. 35 Vanguard |
Did you guys that changed powerhead from kawasaki to briggs have to modify the frame any? Or did the 35 brigs bolt up? |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|