I used to own a Grizzly and was pretty happy with it until I bought the rig I have now. So I'd just like to know your opinions on them. I know they're not mud hulls but is there really such a difference between them and true mud hulls to justify spending twice as much for a true mud hull?

A buddy of mine has one and it's one of the most stable boats I've ever hunted from. I think his is 17x48. Regardless, the Trackers are very stable and will really carry a load.

IMOP The money it cost to buy a true mud hull is money well spent. I had a cheaper hull and i couldn't do half the stuff or go the place i do know. Just wish i would have spent the money sooner

i run a 1860 tracker dragging a MB hyper it runs fine until i get in the mud that looks like a wet cow pasture . but beside that its ok but its not a mud hull . and like the previous post i wish i would have spent the sooner money too
i did see a tracker few weeks back a 1654 and it had the linear ribbs they press into the bottom of the hull that usually stick out were actually inverted so they didnt protrude from the bottom of the hull . i thought that was pretty slick so i asked the guy and he stated he ordered it that way ? I went with a tracker probably because bass pro is 30 minutes from my house but i also run some big water to get to our hunting spots so i thought that was a good option but you know immediatly that you dont got no mud hull when you get into the thick stuff