| MudmotorTalk.com http://www.mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/ |
|
| twins vs single http://www.mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=19133 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | team_shine [ Wed Jun 08, 2011 10:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | twins vs single |
twins vs single? Im looking at either a 1860 or a 2072 and im looking for options on if i should go with twin mm (probably GTR35s maybe PD not positive yet) or just a single. I will be getting console steering either way i go. Are there any reasons why i might not want twins? Thanks, Paul |
|
| Author: | WestEndAngler [ Wed Jun 08, 2011 10:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: twins vs single |
Other than the additional cost for another motor... I have an 1860 & it runs fast but I've also modded the engine to get it to where I want it. |
|
| Author: | slambin [ Wed Jun 08, 2011 10:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: twins vs single |
1860 you will be fine with a single. if you go to a 2072 you will need duals. i have a 2060 with a single and empty it runs about 27. ill be putting duals on it before long |
|
| Author: | dog walker [ Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: twins vs single |
If money is not an option I would do duals over a single modded any day of the week and thats a fact!!!!!!! |
|
| Author: | craig [ Wed Jun 08, 2011 12:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | twins vs single |
| Author: | deltaduckmaster [ Wed Jun 08, 2011 1:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | twins vs single |
Duals all day long with stage ones on both lol!! |
|
| Author: | Brinkleydog [ Thu Jun 09, 2011 8:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: twins vs single |
| Author: | DeathMetalDukk [ Sun Jul 10, 2011 10:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: twins vs single |
| Author: | UNCLE-J [ Mon Jul 11, 2011 7:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: twins vs single |
I really dont even feel the difference in Weight. Maybe if they were both on a tiller, but with the CC, it counters the weight. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|