|
It is currently Tue Feb 17, 2026 8:25 pm
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 13 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Gigafowl
MMT Elite Member
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:19 pm Posts: 6441 Location: Trinity Bay - Texas
|
 Built for speed
US Navy - commissioned a pair of Aluminum Jet Driven warships.....
Capable of 50 + MPH....
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
_________________ Eat - Sleep - Hunt ! ! !
"It is good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the journey that matters, in the end."
|
| Fri Oct 23, 2009 6:53 am |
|
 |
|
Gigafowl
MMT Elite Member
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:19 pm Posts: 6441 Location: Trinity Bay - Texas
|
 Re: Built for speed
BATH, Maine – The Navy's need for speed is being answered by a pair of warships that have reached freeway speeds during testing at sea.
Independence, a 418-foot warship built in Alabama, boasts a top speed in excess of 45 knots, or about 52 mph, and sustained 44 knots for four hours during builder trials that wrapped up this month off the Gulf Coast. The 378-foot Freedom, a ship built in Wisconsin by a competing defense contractor, has put up similar numbers.
Both versions of the Littoral Combat Ship use powerful diesel engines, as well as gas turbines for extra speed. They use steerable waterjets instead of propellers and rudders and have shallower drafts than conventional warships, letting them zoom close to shore.
The ships, better able to chase down pirates, have been fast-tracked because the Navy wants vessels that can operate in coastal, or littoral, waters. Freedom is due to be deployed next year, two years ahead of schedule.
Independence is an aluminum, tri-hulled warship built by Austal USA in Mobile, Ala. The lead contractor is Maine's Bath Iron Works, a subsidiary of General Dynamics.
Lockheed Martin Corp. is leading the team that built Freedom in Marinette, Wis. It looks more like a conventional warship, with a single hull made of steel.
The stakes are high for both teams. The Navy plans to select Lockheed Martin or General Dynamics, but not both, as the builder. The Navy has ordered one more ship from each of the teams before it chooses the final design. Eventually, the Navy wants to build up to 55 of them.
Speed has long been relished by Navy skippers. Capt. John Paul Jones, sometimes described as father of the U.S. Navy, summed it up this way in 1778: "I wish to have no connection with any ship that does not sail fast; for I intend to go in harm's way."
Eric Wertheim, author and editor of the U.S. Naval Institute's "Guide to Combat Fleets of the World," said speed is a good thing, but it comes at a cost.
"This is really something revolutionary," Wertheim said. "The question is how important and how expensive is this burst of speed?"
Early cost estimates for Littoral Combat Ships were about $220 million apiece, but costs spiraled because of the Navy's requirements and its desire to expedite construction. The cost of the ships is capped at $460 million apiece, starting in the new fiscal year.
Both ships are built to accommodate helicopters and mission "modules" for either anti-submarine missions, mine removal or traditional surface warfare. The goal is for the modules to be swapped out in 24 hours, and no later than 96 hours, allowing the ships to adapt quickly to new missions, said Cmdr. Victor Chen, a Navy spokesman.
While they're fast, they aren't necessarily the fastest military ships afloat. The Navy used to have missile-equipped hydrofoils and the Marines' air-cushioned landing craft is capable of similar speeds, Wertheim said. And smaller ships are capable of higher speeds.
Nonetheless, the speed is impressive, especially considering that other large naval vessels have been cruising along at a relatively pokey 30 to 35 knots for decades.
Loren Thompson, a defense analyst at the Lexington Institute, noted that Independence sustained 44 knots despite a 30-knot headwind and 6- to 8-foot seas in Alabama's Mobile Bay. "For a ship of this size, it's simply unheard of to sustain that rate of speed for four hours," he said
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
_________________ Eat - Sleep - Hunt ! ! !
"It is good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the journey that matters, in the end."
|
| Fri Oct 23, 2009 6:56 am |
|
 |
|
mudd
MMT Pro Member
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:44 pm Posts: 443 Location: Wisconsin
|
 Re: Built for speed
If they say it does 50,,,, it prolly does close to 70
I can tell you that an Air Craft carrier will pull over 40 knots.
If'n I remember right. lol
_________________ THE, FIRST and ONLY MMT Member of the Year!
|
| Fri Oct 23, 2009 6:43 pm |
|
 |
|
B.M. Barrelcooker
MMT F.E.
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:13 pm Posts: 992 Location: Aintry,Ky
|
 Re: Built for speed
sweet
_________________ Twin aucouoin 17-48's and three 6's of the pd.
|
| Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:17 pm |
|
 |
|
DeathMetalDukk
MMT 1000 Club
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:50 pm Posts: 3777 Location: Knotts Island, North Carolina.
|
 Re: Built for speed
Awesome. I'd totally like to see Poker make 'em a pop up blind for it.
_________________ Put yer face in the myrtles.
35 GTR chasing a 1650 Polarkrap.
|
| Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:21 pm |
|
 |
|
POKER1
MMT Elite Member
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:02 pm Posts: 6243 Location: Bossier City
|
 Re: Built for speed
Kool, I think I saw on the millitary channel that a modern super carrier can do 30-40 knots.
_________________ 18x48 Charles Leonard / 36PD
"I do think there is a Squatch in these woods"!!!!!
|
| Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:26 pm |
|
 |
|
mudd
MMT Pro Member
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:44 pm Posts: 443 Location: Wisconsin
|
 Re: Built for speed
I was on The USS George Washington CVN 73 for sea trial and comissioning. Yep a frigging Aircraft carrier will smoke any of ya'lls mud rigs! Ha
_________________ THE, FIRST and ONLY MMT Member of the Year!
|
| Tue Oct 27, 2009 1:17 pm |
|
 |
|
BradS
MMT 1000 Club
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:23 am Posts: 4514 Location: Lafayette, La
|
 Re: Built for speed
That thing is sick Must be pushed by a go devil huh giga?
|
| Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:43 pm |
|
 |
|
T-mac
MMT Addict
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:53 pm Posts: 605
|
 Re: Built for speed
What ya'll saw or remembered from the Military Channel regarding the top speed of a Nuclear Carrier is that the information is CLASSIFIED-
|
| Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:42 pm |
|
 |
|
mcnemar1982
MMT Sponsor
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:03 pm Posts: 2216 Location: Walker, Louisiana
|
 Re: Built for speed
_________________ Ideas not coupled with action never become bigger than the brain cells they occupied.
Owner DEEP SOUTH CUSTOM BOATS (225) 252-2700 Good boats ain't cheap, Cheap boats ain't good!
|
| Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:09 pm |
|
 |
|
Mudgun
MMT Addict
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:24 pm Posts: 746 Location: Here Be Rocks VA
|
 Re: Built for speed
We saw something off the VA coast two years ago that was big and smoking fast. Talked to some guys that fish near the Norfolk base and they said they bring it in at night and clear a path for it. You move.
Same with subs. If you don't get out of the way...they will gun yo azz after a warning. And let me tell you a sub throws a wake like nothing I've seen.
_________________ 1660 Rhino High-Side with center console 90/65 Mercury 2 stroke Outboard jet pump Run shallow, run loud.
|
| Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:09 pm |
|
 |
|
DeathMetalDukk
MMT 1000 Club
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:50 pm Posts: 3777 Location: Knotts Island, North Carolina.
|
 Re: Built for speed
Yeah I've seen them bringing a sub into Norfolk, that's some serious shit. Even moving slow they push a shitload of water.
_________________ Put yer face in the myrtles.
35 GTR chasing a 1650 Polarkrap.
|
| Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:58 pm |
|
 |
|
marsh maniac
MMT Pro Member
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 1:50 pm Posts: 156
|
 Re: Built for speed
i bout go run over by the independence last week. we were draggin in the ship channel and we saw it coming down, but didn't realize how fast she was running. we BARELY got the trawl up in time to turn the boat around to face teh ship's huge arse wake. that sucker closed several miles in no time flat. my butt was clinched so tight, i don't think i coulda farted a gnat sized fart.
|
| Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:05 pm |
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 13 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|