When Eljefe tells us about it three times, you better take note that it is important info.

“A system of morality which is based on relative emotional values is a mere illusion, a thoroughly vulgar conception which has nothing sound in it and nothing true. “ ~Socrates

Tyrone

Soc. And what sort of difference creates enmity and anger? Suppose for example that you and I, my good friend, differ about a number; do differences of this sort make us enemies and set us at variance with one another? Do we not go at once to arithmetic, and put an end to them by a sum?

Euth. True.

Soc. Or suppose that we differ about magnitudes, do we not quickly end the differences by measuring?

Euth. Very true.

Soc. And we end a controversy about heavy and light by resorting to a weighing machine?

Euth. To be sure.

Soc. But what differences are there which cannot be thus decided, and which therefore make us angry and set us at enmity with one another? I dare say the answer does not occur to you at the moment, and therefore I will suggest that these enmities arise when the matters of difference are the just and unjust, good and evil, honorable and dishonorable. Are not these the points about which men differ, and about which when we are unable satisfactorily to decide our differences, you and I and all of us quarrel, when we do quarrel?

dguidry: When numbers, statistics differ, there should be no quarrel between men. We should only quarrel when we both agree on the numbers but call each others proposed actions based on them just or unjust, good or evil, honorable or dishonorable.

x

x

Good job ranger!!!

great post eljefe!!

x

Here here!!!!!

sent from the former Republic of Texas.

X2

2 Thessalonians 3:10

For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat.

Redistribution of wealth.....

How come when a thug takes money from someone against their will it's called a crime but yet it is ok when the government does it?

I know why Dean as supports socialism (besides being delusional)... He IS Afterall a lawyer and he knows that with more handouts, lack of personal responsibility, lack of real criminal punishment, career criminals.... He will NEVER be out of work. Criminal law might not be his forte, but......

x

WOW is all I can say about most of the comments on that page with the video. wow

One example:

"This just horrific. Wonder if the NRA feels any responsibility? This is going to keep happening until every single person is somehow touched by gun deaths. We need gun laws and they need to enforced. Pretty soon going to the store for a loaf of bread is going to be a risky venture."

"If America doesn't want its citizens shooting each other, the only solution is to disarm its citizens. If that doesn't happen, they will just continue to shoot each other."

the most repulsive and anti bill of rights rants ive ever heard....Shows the ignorance of the libtards.... To blame legal guns and gun owners on illegal guns and gun use by illegal gun possessors..... And to the ignorant and uniformed that posted about how they could be next or that gun violence will soon touch everyone personally.....There is a less than .1% chance they will ever be involved in gun violence and less than 1% that they will know anyone who will experience gun violence. Now if you want to break it down to demographics, im sure there are some places for certain minorities that would be a 75% chance to be involved in a violent act involving a gun.....so knowing that, stay away from those areas unless you wanna get shot.....All you can do is inform people, but that dosent take the dumbass out of them.

x

just to be fair, the dc shooter was never charged with anything for his gun crimes.....never went to court and no convictions....... What i find funny in an evil sense is the same group that did the background check on snowden for his job at nsa as a contractor did the background check on the dc shooter for his job as a contractor........

Liberal: a person so open minded their brain fell out!

x