| MudmotorTalk.com https://www.mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/ |
|
| Rigid..... LED vs. Dually https://www.mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=33022 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Greenhead Grappler [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
All you Rigid Industries ppl out there. Since they are about the same price I'm trying to decide between a 10 in. spot/flood LED Bar OR 2 Flood Duallys and 1 Spot Dually. Looking at Lumens alone looks like light bar is the way to go. Anyone had both or offer up some advice? |
|
| Author: | marsh mule [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
There is a post that shows pictures of both at night |
|
| Author: | barnes_53 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
is this deja vu or is the search function broken? Here is the link to it: |
|
| Author: | cb5331 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
| Author: | barnes_53 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
Do a search for any of these terms: Rigid Industries LED Light Bar Dually D2 |
|
| Author: | cb5331 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
No |
|
| Author: | barnes_53 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
Lazy |
|
| Author: | Greenhead Grappler [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
Im so so sorry I didn't search more first. But thanks for the link. One thing ive noticed is every question on this site has somebody griping about how its already been asked. There are only so many things on a mud boat. Every question should be "can someone send me a link to..." for now on. |
|
| Author: | Kmoppert [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
I'm so so sorry for this... But its a lay up. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=rigid+mud+motor+talk |
|
| Author: | barnes_53 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
amazing what you can find if you do a search |
|
| Author: | cb5331 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
imagine how much better it would be if the search actually worked like it was supposed to |
|
| Author: | barnes_53 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
CB...stop acting like DGuidry, seriously |
|
| Author: | cb5331 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
Barnes, stop acting like a dumbass, seriously |
|
| Author: | cb5331 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
Let's break this down, since apparently you attended the same school as mighty mouse. YOU asked if the search feature was broken. I responded that yes, the search feature was in fact broken and it would be a good idea to let new members know how to use an alternate search engine to find threads. YOU then asked me to do a search about something I couldn't give less of a shit about so I responded, no. Then you called me lazy, which makes no sense. Then you pat yourself on the back with the "amazing what you can find if you do a search", which was actually posted after another member used the method I recommended in my first post. I responded by saying "imagine how much better it would be if the search actually worked like it was supposed to". Then you told me to stop acting like our resident ninja, which again makes no sense. I've been here a pretty long time and yes I've seen the same fuckin thread topics posted over and over and over again. Yes it gets old and before the server switch, I was the first to recommend the search feature to new members starting repeat threads. The fact is that the search feature doesn't really work anymore. I'm not gonna harp on newbies that don't know any better to use a feature of the forum that doesn't even work. If anything, you need to be referring them to another search engine, not linking them to instructions for one that doesn't work. If they try the search and nothing comes up, they have no way of knowing the forum is broken and to use another method unless someone tells them. |
|
| Author: | barnes_53 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
hey dumbass....go do a search for the word "rigid". HMMM.....90+ results on three pages. Yeah it's broke. Just admit your a fucking inbred retard you stupid fuck! |
|
| Author: | cb5331 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
| Author: | barnes_53 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
OK...it doesn't search past august...big deal. If anyone was going to ask this question and searched first you would clearly see its not required to go that far back and your answer is in a thread that was just updated today! |
|
| Author: | cb5331 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
| Author: | barnes_53 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
You're a fucking tard. It was a rhetorical question you fucking moron. If you don't know what rhetorical means use your Google search for that too dipshit. |
|
| Author: | cb5331 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
I know what rhetorical means, but I'm not sure that you do. If it was a rhetorical question, then you were insinuating that the search feature did in fact work properly and was not broken. If that is that case, than you would be the "fucking tard", "fucking moron", and the "dipshit", because the search feature is in fact, BROKEN. By the way, you suck at this. 
|
|
| Author: | barnes_53 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
CB you are catching on finally. I know this must be mentally exhausting for you. That is exactly what I was insinuating, but since you seem to have a very limited mental capacity I invite you to go back and read this thread in it's entirety to refresh that peanut between your ears. Sure looks broken to me: So here is your vocabulary homework lesson: (because none of which you clearly do not understand) 1. rhetorical 2. insinuate 3. broken Bonus word = SUCK (sk) v. sucked, suck·ing, sucks v.tr. 1. Draw into the mouth by creating a practical vacuum in the mouth Example used as a verb: CB5331 likes to suck cock. |
|
| Author: | med [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
Fact of the matter is that search sucks. It will pick up recent topics but that's all. |
|
| Author: | cb5331 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
THE SEARCH FEATURE NO LONGER WORKS TO FIND ANYTHING BEFORE AUGUST. IT IS NOT WORKING PROPERLY WHICH THEREFORE QUALIFIES IT AS BROKEN. It appears as if you should research the terms of which you speak, because you are obviously having a really, really hard time with them. Here I will try to help. Broken- not functioning properly; out of working order. Example: The search feature only pulls up threads from the last two months and ignores everything from the past 3 years. It is BROKEN. Insinuate- to suggest or hint slyly Example: Barnes insinuated that the search feature was working as it was designed to, but it turns out he was wrong. Rhetorical- of, concerned with, or having the nature of rhetoric. Rhetoric- the undue use of exaggeration or display; bombast. In Layman's terms, since you seem to be really struggling with what this means: A rhetorical question is a figure of speech in the form of a question that is asked in order to make a point and without the expectation of a reply.[1] The question is used as a rhetorical device, posed for the sake of encouraging its listener to consider a message or viewpoint. Though these are technically questions, they do not always require a question mark. For example, the question "Is the search function broken?" is asked not to gain information about the search feature itself, but to insinuate that the search feature is working just fine. In this case, the search feature is actually broken and the "rhetoric" of the question has backfired. Study up on all that and see if it all starts to make sense. Here's your bonus: Suicide Barnes should really commit suicide because he serves no useful purpose on this planet. |
|
| Author: | barnes_53 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
LMAO |
|
| Author: | cb5331 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
| Author: | med [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
10-4. It is broke. |
|
| Author: | cb5331 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
|
|
|
| Author: | brasso [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
| Author: | barnes_53 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
CB- Don't look to Med for help. You can't handle the fucking heat bro. Do you need your helmet? |
|
| Author: | cb5331 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
Is that some kinda democrat style tactic? Getting your ass kicked, so you try to change the topic or do something totally irrelevant to try to make your opponent look bad? Either way, it reeks of defeat. I feel like Romney beating obama's ass last week in the debate! Maybe we can get Tony to change your name for you, Barack Obama Barnes_53! |
|
| Author: | cb5331 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
The funniest part of your last post is that you insulted yourself just as much as you attempted to insult me. Man, you are a fuckin' genius!
|
|
| Author: | barnes_53 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
No democratic tactic here. It seems you're limited in comprehension by reading so I broke it down for you visually; the only way you could understand it. And the funniest part about this whole thing is you continue to get sand in your clit and I am going to keep going at you if you continue to spew stupid shit out of your cock holster. |
|
| Author: | cb5331 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
Okay, Corky.
|
|
| Author: | barnes_53 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
weak |
|
| Author: | cb5331 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
Weak- lacking strength Every post Obama Barnes_53 has made on this thread, has been WEAK. |
|
| Author: | barnes_53 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
...and again
|
|
| Author: | cb5331 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
Must |
|
| Author: | cb5331 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
Have |
|
| Author: | cb5331 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
Last |
|
| Author: | cb5331 [ Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rigid..... LED vs. Dually |
Word |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|