MudmotorTalk.com https://www.mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/ |
|
Should I even consider a .100 Hull? https://www.mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=50475 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Kre [ Mon Feb 17, 2014 8:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
I'm shopping for a small mud rig for trapping. I don't see myself doing a lot banging around in wood/stumps. Rather, I need something suited for shallow water and weeds. Should I even consider a .100 hull? |
Author: | North LA Hunter [ Mon Feb 17, 2014 8:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
It would be fine if you didn't hit any stumps/logs. No need in any thicker bottom. Should last a long time if taken care of! Sent from my beeper |
Author: | WhoDat88 [ Mon Feb 17, 2014 8:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
The .100 hall has cross bracing. Cross bracing is bad news did shallow water riding. It is really easy to hook a boat with cross bracing. However, those boats will work on mud motors. Many people use them. I just sold my rig with .100 aluminum. It worked fine for me. I decided to get a bigger and better boat with 1/8th and different bracing. If your budget allows I suggest getting a boat designed for a mud motor. If you need to get a .100 boat to ride in for a while it will work. Just make sure not to dent the bottom. |
Author: | eljefe [ Mon Feb 17, 2014 8:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
Huh?? I haven't seen a .1 mud hull with out cross bracing over the stringers......and how do they cause hooks? Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk |
Author: | North LA Hunter [ Mon Feb 17, 2014 8:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
Author: | WhoDat88 [ Mon Feb 17, 2014 8:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
Author: | diddyduck [ Mon Feb 17, 2014 8:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
Author: | North LA Hunter [ Mon Feb 17, 2014 8:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
Where bouts you located? If its not too far you could get in touch with Cottonmouth Custom Boats. He builds some nice small lightweight boats. Sent from my beeper |
Author: | WhoDat88 [ Mon Feb 17, 2014 8:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
Author: | eljefe [ Mon Feb 17, 2014 8:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
whatever you purchase, make sure it has longitudinal stringers...... |
Author: | Kre [ Mon Feb 17, 2014 9:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
I'm considering a Phowler Light Jon 1640 or 1740. |
Author: | btmannin [ Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
The lite Jon's aren't even .1 if i remember correctly. I think they are .090, maybe even .08 |
Author: | Kre [ Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
Author: | btmannin [ Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
I stand corrected. I'd say go for it. I have heard nothing but good things about phowler boats. Both on the product side, and customer service |
Author: | diddyduck [ Mon Feb 17, 2014 12:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
Author: | Woodiebuster [ Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
I wouldn't hesitate to run a .100 boat if I was in clear marsh with nothing but grass, mud, and shallow water to worry about. Until then, I'll keep beating around in my .190 hull ![]() |
Author: | WhoDat88 [ Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
Phowler does not mention bracing on the lite hall. However, it is .100 grain built with a stronger grade aluminum than traditional jon boats. The boat looks like it it built well on the website. Made for surface drive motors up to 27hp. |
Author: | cb5331 [ Tue Feb 18, 2014 1:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
.100 grain boat hulls, i've heard it all now. ![]() |
Author: | North LA Hunter [ Tue Feb 18, 2014 2:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
What kills me is when people say .100 gauge. It's not gauge it's just thickness. Gauges are 16 ga, 18 ga, 20 ga, etc. Sent from my beeper |
Author: | fowllife08 [ Tue Feb 18, 2014 2:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
Author: | barnes_53 [ Tue Feb 18, 2014 3:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
ask yourself, "Would I bring a knife to a gunfight?" |
Author: | North LA Hunter [ Tue Feb 18, 2014 3:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
Author: | barnes_53 [ Tue Feb 18, 2014 4:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
^^^ if that's the best you can do you better stay at home with that janky shit and avoid that fight altogether. That shit is hideous! LOL |
Author: | 4Cody4 [ Tue Feb 18, 2014 4:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
^hater |
Author: | WhoDat88 [ Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
You are correct. It is thickness. You are correct I said grain instead of thickness. You are the smartest man alive and I am a dumb ass. You are the man and I am not. You are the most intelligent guy on mud motor talk. I wish I could be like you. Oh and until next time, Go Fuck Yourself!!!!!! |
Author: | barnes_53 [ Tue Feb 18, 2014 6:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
North LA Hunter, WhoDat88 is going to need to borrow your Kgun it looks like. |
Author: | WhoDat88 [ Tue Feb 18, 2014 6:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
I am going to be just fine. I just popped open a can of coors light and I'm about to eat some shrimp with my wife. That is a perfect ending to a very long day of meetings. |
Author: | BradS [ Tue Feb 18, 2014 6:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
No |
Author: | MNGunner [ Tue Feb 18, 2014 8:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
Author: | da go get'er [ Tue Feb 18, 2014 8:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
Author: | barnes_53 [ Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
Author: | North LA Hunter [ Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
Author: | MNGunner [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 7:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
Author: | North LA Hunter [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 7:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
Author: | MNGunner [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 1:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
Author: | North LA Hunter [ Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Should I even consider a .100 Hull? |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |