MudmotorTalk.com https://www.mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/ |
|
2 "fat" blade https://www.mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=68521 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Bayoublackhunter [ Tue Oct 04, 2016 8:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | 2 "fat" blade |
Anybody run one? I've got one that's balanced from baggy and still vibrates bad. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk |
Author: | HOTSAUCE170 [ Wed Oct 05, 2016 7:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2 |
Author: | Bayoublackhunter [ Fri Oct 07, 2016 4:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2 "fat" blade |
Bruh my vibrates bad. I ran a worn BB and it ran better that that fat blade. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk |
Author: | Ricerunner [ Sun Oct 09, 2016 5:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2 "fat" blade |
GT says you can't run that prop on a stock 35. Only a modded or 37. On another note during the conversation I was also told that running a BB would potentially cause the lower to crack as a result of vibration and warranty would not cover it...on the newer cast lowers that is. Also that they would not sell the Fat to someone with a stock 35 unless they adamantly wanted it. |
Author: | Russ [ Sun Oct 09, 2016 6:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2 "fat" blade |
So a big blade voids the warranty but their own props dont. Interesting. |
Author: | JD145 [ Sun Oct 09, 2016 8:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2 |
Author: | JD145 [ Sun Oct 09, 2016 8:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2 |
Author: | Bayoublackhunter [ Mon Oct 10, 2016 12:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2 "fat" blade |
I'm not stock. I have one of the original lower units that we tested and I've ran the 2 blades for several hundred hours without problems Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk |
Author: | Ricerunner [ Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:53 am ] |
Post subject: | 2 "fat" blade |
Author: | Ricerunner [ Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2 "fat" blade |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |