MudmotorTalk.com
https://www.mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/

Gear Reduction
https://www.mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=40774
Page 1 of 1

Author:  rrmilner [ Wed May 15, 2013 8:50 am ]
Post subject:  Gear Reduction

What do you guys think about gear reduction? What companies make Gear Reduction Long Tails?
Could you buy an engine that comes with gear reduction and then attach it to a Direct Drive Long Tail Kit?

Author:  tailfisher17t [ Wed May 15, 2013 2:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Gear Reduction

Its great.

mud buddy

NO

Author:  bobbyjober [ Wed May 15, 2013 2:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Gear Reduction

Go devil makes a 9hp that has reduction built onto engine. So yes you can put an engine with built on gear reduction on a longtail frame.

Author:  da go get'er [ Wed May 15, 2013 7:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Gear Reduction

Personally I wouldn't want gears on a long tail. I'd tear the teeth out plus the smaller prop allows for shallow water accessibility more so than a sd prop

Author:  Glades Ranger [ Thu May 16, 2013 6:00 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Gear Reduction

Good point, da go get'er! The MB SLT is very new and durability still remains a question for their gear reduction via a belt drive and pulleys, but I would bet this might be a better fit and prevent serious damages to motor and components rather than gears....I know this is debatable but I tend to favor the convenience of both neutral and gear reduction in the same package. You make a good point as well about the smaller LT prop- I know I bottom out sooner than my friend with his SD motor in the skinny...he gets in farther but when he bottoms out he is real stuck down here with the hard sand/marl bottom we have- reverse will not help. He also gets more severe wear on his larger SD prop sooner and faster as oppesed to our smaller LT prop. In thick mud conditions, the SD prop would definitely be better, but all marshes and hunting grounds are not all the same. The LT remains very viable in my neck of the woods, I mean marsh. :mrgreen: These gear reduction couplers may be the ticket for smaller HP applications to get the most out of smaller motors in smaller waters but I also tend to agree I'd want a stronger frame assembly (as FranktheTau argues on the other post).

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/