MudmotorTalk.com https://www.mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/ |
|
Backwater SWOMP https://www.mudmotortalk.com/mmt_v2/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=59789 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | notransitory128 [ Sun Feb 01, 2015 8:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Backwater SWOMP |
How do yall think a 23 SWOMP would run on a 1542 Alweld. I have a quote for a 1738 Gatortrax rogue with a 35 SWOMP but just curious if I even need a brand new boat. Thanks!! ![]() |
Author: | WhoDat88 [ Sun Feb 01, 2015 8:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Backwater SWOMP |
Author: | JLACOUR [ Sun Feb 01, 2015 8:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Backwater SWOMP |
Author: | notransitory128 [ Sun Feb 01, 2015 9:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Backwater SWOMP |
I'm military and move a whole lot and want something that's extremely versatile in any shallow water. That's why I chose the 38" bottom and a longtail v. Surface drive. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Author: | JLACOUR [ Sun Feb 01, 2015 10:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Backwater SWOMP |
I understand the narrow boat benefits since my last one was 36" wide. |
Author: | notransitory128 [ Sun Feb 01, 2015 10:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Backwater SWOMP |
Nice! I guess gatortrax it is!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Author: | MDMarsh [ Mon Feb 02, 2015 8:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Backwater SWOMP |
You will sit fairly low in the stern with the 38 bottom and 35 hanging off it. I have a 1638 with huntdeck with a 24 longtail on it. Boat is great for running the marsh and narrow ditches but if I was going with the 35 which is like an extra 50lbs I would probably be looking at the 44 bottom. If you really want the 38 bottom I would look at moving up to at least an 18' length and make sure I had the tall sides. |
Author: | KingPin(BFM) [ Mon Feb 02, 2015 8:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Backwater SWOMP |
I run a GX690 Honda on my backwater, sitting on a 1548 weldbilt and love it. it may not be the thickest "bulldozer" hull, but it gets me where I wanna go and I don't have 20K tied up. I recommend anything from backwater. |
Author: | notransitory128 [ Mon Feb 02, 2015 12:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Backwater SWOMP |
Well apparently there about to 30-40 lbs lighter because of a design change. Supposed to be on their site this week. That'd be bad ass! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Author: | notransitory128 [ Mon Feb 02, 2015 12:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Backwater SWOMP |
Author: | MDMarsh [ Mon Feb 02, 2015 8:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Backwater SWOMP |
With a 2 man hunting load at the end of the season I was at 16. Earlier in the year with a fresh prop 17 to 18 deep water. It's a great small water rig. I have had 3 with a full hunting load and still get on plane without a problem but that's really pushing it for space. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |