Author |
Message |
mranderson27
MMT Member
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:40 am Posts: 36
|
 Pods and surface drive
Hello all.... I have read some posts on pods being bad for surface drives.. I have a 1750 Beavertail with a stock 35 hp surface drive. I seem to be significantly slower than other rigs similar to mine and now with a new 12.25 hammer prop when I get to 3700-3800 my prop almost looks and feels like it's vibrating or chopping threw the water. Has anyone had any experience having pods and then removing them? Thanks in advance...
|
Mon Aug 24, 2015 3:20 pm |
|
 |
Buzz Killington
MMT 1000 Club
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 12:33 pm Posts: 2455
|
 Re: Pods and surface drive
1. Pods are not great for surface drive motors. They do great with LTs. 2. A stock 35 with a hammer prop? You need some serious HP to turn one of those. A stocker wont turn a hammer very well. 3. Options if you want more speed/performance - get a new boat, go LT, remove pods, weld a bottom across the pods to make it a hunt deck, get a different prop, be happy with what you have and realize that you don't have a 30mph rig, sell all and start with a new setup.....I'd honestly change the prop for starters....then go from there
B. MacDonald
_________________ Support your troops - they support you
B. MacDonald
|
Mon Aug 24, 2015 5:41 pm |
|
 |
mranderson27
MMT Member
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:40 am Posts: 36
|
 Re: Pods and surface drive
Thanks! I will start with the prop. I got some bad advice from someone when I bought that one... I do understand I won't/don't have a 30 mph rig. Just wanting to optimize what I have right now within reason... Would you remove the pods no matter what?
|
Mon Aug 24, 2015 7:13 pm |
|
 |
mranderson27
MMT Member
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:40 am Posts: 36
|
 Re: Pods and surface drive
I should fix my first post my prop is the tiger prop not the hammer... I think the hammer is 12.75 and the tiger is 12.25
|
Mon Aug 24, 2015 7:33 pm |
|
 |
Russ
MMT 1000 Club
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:07 pm Posts: 4820 Location: West Monroe, LA
|
 Re: Pods and surface drive
Tiger props are for long tails. The big blade is the 12.25x10 for surface drives.
|
Mon Aug 24, 2015 8:47 pm |
|
 |
hunt-chessies
MMT Pro Member
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 10:55 am Posts: 86 Location: Jacksonville FL
|
 Re: Pods and surface drive
on a 1750 what advantage would pods give you?? most ppl i know that have pods do it because the boat is too small and they run too much weight (mostly motor). i can't imagine that issue being relevant on a 1750 boat!?!?! that's a decent sized rig. Have you looks for hooks or anything like that on the bottom that's robbing your performance??
_________________ 1854 Prodigy with a 37 EFI HDR Owned by a Chessie... HR "A Hunters Dream Of Westwind" JH (HUNTLEY)
|
Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:41 am |
|
 |
cb5331
MMT Super Elite Member
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:10 pm Posts: 16915 Location: Rowlett, TX
|
 Re: Pods and surface drive
That's how the fucktards at beavertail build boats...they also run their bracing opposite of every other mud hull on the market.
|
Thu Aug 27, 2015 8:10 am |
|
 |
Flounder
MMT Member
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2015 2:26 pm Posts: 27
|
 Re: Pods and surface drive
^ this
|
Thu Aug 27, 2015 1:23 pm |
|
 |
mranderson27
MMT Member
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:40 am Posts: 36
|
 Re: Pods and surface drive
Like stated above all Beavertail boats for some reason come with them... This would not have beens first choice I aquired the boat on a great deal.... So that said I'm trying to optimize what I have.... Would you guys for sure remove the pods? What would I gain for performance by removing them versus keeping them?
|
Thu Aug 27, 2015 2:43 pm |
|
 |
TooTall
MMT Pro Member
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2014 1:37 pm Posts: 411 Location: Pineville, La
|
 Re: Pods and surface drive
When you're in mud and that sob bites and turns and slams against the pods you'll be wishing you cut them off..
|
Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:41 pm |
|
 |
mranderson27
MMT Member
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:40 am Posts: 36
|
 Re: Pods and surface drive
I removed the pods and it has made a huge difference gained significant speed and handles much better
|
Mon Oct 26, 2015 9:50 am |
|
 |
dennishaussler
MMT Pro Member
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 9:22 pm Posts: 53
|
 Re: Pods and surface drive
|
Mon Apr 18, 2016 5:24 pm |
|
 |
Mallards Only
MMT Pro Member
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:23 pm Posts: 404 Location: Idaho
|
 Re: Pods and surface drive
_________________ 1860 Prodigy
|
Tue Apr 19, 2016 6:49 am |
|
 |
50fps
MMT 1000 Club
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 6:42 pm Posts: 2377 Location: West Coast Wisconsin
|
 Re: Pods and surface drive
I ran a 1748 for a couple years with a 27 PD, some of the short comings of the hull is the sharp rake angle and extra bracing between the Longitudinal bracing "it contacts the bottom and creates washboard" Even with only a 27 It still ran mid twenties with two people. The pods limit bow rise and kill the speed approx 1mph, the bow rake when heavily loaded really hinders getting on plane. As others have said a Lt works best and high HP never hurts.
|
Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:41 am |
|
 |
|